Archive for the ‘1970s Bear Market’ Category

Managing Your Investments in these Economic Times; Five Key Points, a Detailed Look

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

In these economic times, investors are challenged to believe that they are still on the right track for investing. Quite simply, this global economic crisis has had the ability to shake one’s confidence in their investment strategy.

Given the magnitude of global news headlines and market behavior, it is easy to believe one is not on the right investment path. During extreme market declines such as the one we are in, you might think that selling all your investment and going to cash is the right thing to do. An investor may have a unique need that dictates a certain course of action away from the following recommendations, but generally speaking, selling assets in a declining market is the wrong action to take.

Over long periods of time, world economies will grow and then they will decline. It is very much a part of the business cycle. The good news is that in recent decades economic declines have been shorter (14 months) and the economic expansions (68 months) have lasted longer. Yes we are very much in a recession today; an economy, which is not growing. But guess what all recessions have in common, a beginning and an end.  The current recession was recently announced as having begun one year ago, December 2007. I actually find that good news. Why you ask? The typical recession last only 14 months as reflected above.  There have been nine ‘official’ recessions since 1949. (See chart below)

jpmbearmktcycles2

We are in the tenth recession now. There have been very few recessions that lasted greater than 14 months, something closer to 24 months in duration. I am not to predict the length of this current recession, but to merely note that this recession will probably last longer than the average one. Anyway you look at it, the current recession will end, and thus the first major point for you as an investor to understand.

1st Key Point:

Stock markets, on average, rallied over 34% one year after a recession ends, and economic expansions last, on average, 68 months for a cumulative gain of 176%

spxrecess1

2nd Key Point:

Much of the investment return occurs within the first three to six months of the rally.

This generally happens while economic news is still negative. Note the chart above, 15% return in first 3 months of recovery after a recession and 23% return within six months, on average. If an investor is in cash, they lose out on much of the recovery the markets have to offer.

3rd Key Point:

Stock markets recover well before economic news turns positive.

Financial markets are always looking into the future to determine their direction. In the chart below, we can see the S&P 500 index from 1974 through 1975. The three rectangle boxes reflect negative economic growth from Oct 1974 to July 1975 as measured by US. Gross Domestic Product, GDP. Note how the market rose during that same time frame, well over 40% in just nine months and over 30% in twelve months, October 1974 to October 1975. The negative headlines of the day were plentiful; Nixon, Watergate, gas shortages, inflation etc.

This is what financial markets do; they will go up even while the current economic news of the day is negative. As Warren Buffet has said, ‘If you wait for the robins, spring will be over’.

1974bearmarketlowandgdp1

Another way to look at markets rising with bad news is with unemployment data. Twelve months after unemployment peaked within a given recession, the S&P 500 index rallied, on average, 29%. Note chart below.

conconf1

4th Key Point:

Do not try and ‘time the market’.

This is to say, sell your assets now and wait a better time to reinvest in the future. It is widely known that market timing is nearly impossible to do successfully. The key word here is ‘successfully’.

I will recast work from my January 7, 2008 blog to help answer the question, why such poor investor behavior?

‘The Penalty for Missing the Market’ is a study frequently created by Wall Street investment firms reflecting the S&P 500 index over long time periods and what happens to returns by missing just a few days in the market. I have referenced a January 2007 Goldman Sachs report.

Simply put, when markets move, they do so in short, quick, explosive measures. If investors are not in the market on those very few powerful, explosive days, annualized returns will suffer greatly. As the Goldman report states, “Two Potential Keys to Success: Patience and Commitment” Enough said! Hey if investing was so easy, we might all be retired by now, right?

Average Annual Total Return: 1985-2006

S&P 500 Index 12.12%

Missing the 10 Best Days 8.56%
Missing the 40 Best Days 1.87%
Missing the 70 Best Days –3.02%

missingmkts2

If I could forecast the next best 70 days to invest over the twenty years, I would, but it cannot be done.

Lastly, it is ok to recognize that investment time periods like this are emotional. It is what makes us human. But we have to be careful to not let our emotions control our investment process. In fact, our investments and their allocations must be based upon well-laid plans that endure in all financial and economic environments. Are your investments and their allocations well planned, can they endure all economic environments?

5th Key Point:

Have a well-laid investment plan.  Your investment plan should based upon factual, sound investment processes and one that is not based upon emotion.

emotionpost4

Summary

It is very easy to want to sell your investments and go to ‘safe’ alternatives such as money market funds or certificates of deposits to weather the storm. Knowing all the information in this article, I can say that this recession will end and the markets will recover. As I heard it said in recent weeks, “its not what we own going into a recession, (investment wise) but rather what we hold coming out of the recession”

Make sure your investments are positioned properly for the next recovery.

1st Key Point:
Stock markets, on average, rallied over 34% one year after a recession ends, and economic expansions last, on average, 68 months for a cumulative gain of 176%

2nd Key Point:
Much of the investment return occurs within the first three to six months of the rally.

3rd Key Point:
Stock markets recover well before economic news turns positive.

4th Key Point:
Do not try and ‘time the market’.

5th Key Point:
Have a well-laid investment plan.  Your investment plan should based upon factual, sound investment processes and one that is not based upon emotion.

Thanks for reading. I welcome your comments, concerns or questions.

Addendum:

Recent weblog postings containing much of the content found in this article.

Stock Markets Rally before Economic News Turns Positive:

Stock Markets Rally Before Economic News turns Positive, Part One

Stock Markets Rally Before Economic News turns Positive, Part Two

Articles on Recessions and Market Recoveries:

It’s Official, Now What and Where Do We Go from Here?

Recessions and Bear Markets: A History of Inconsistencies

Market Timing/Missing the Markets:

Why I Don’t Time the Market

What to do now?

Missing the Market

Emotions in the Investment Process:

Beware of the Hidden Cost of Cash

Just a reminder….Smart Investing Begins with a Disciplined Approach, not a    Cycle of Emotion

Stock Markets Rally Before Economic News turns Positive, Part One

Monday, October 27th, 2008

As I alluded to in a previous blog posting, stock markets will rally well in advance of positive economic news being reported.

This seems counter-intuitive Dave? Let us remember, that stock markets are what we say ‘discounting mechanisms’. This is to say, markets are looking forward in order to set current valuations. Therefore, the low market valuations of today are taking into consideration all the bad economic news that is expected over the next year let’s say. Once markets begins to look beyond this news, they will begin to rally well in advance of actual positive economic news being delivered.

Let’s examine what happened back in the 1970’s to gain perspective on this.

The market (as measured by the S&P 500 index) bottomed out October 1974 (and re-tested that low in December 1974) then went on to rally by 30.84% over the next twelve month period (Oct 74-Oct 75) while negative economic news (GDP Growth) was being reported well into mid 1975. GDP growth was negative for three consecutive quarters during this time frame yet the S&P 500 index rallied in excess of 30%. Had one waited for good economic news, much of the gain would have already been recorded. If I told you that the markets will rally by over 30% to 40% in the next year, you would be hard pressed to digest that right now. Just as it would have been difficult in 1974. I’m not making a prediction here, but to merely illustrate how seemingly impossible that claim seems. (As in saying, gasoline at $2,89 a gallon today! Make that claim 3 months ago! There you go)

* Q3 1974 – 3.8% (known in late Q4 1974)
* Q4 1974 – 1.6% (known in late Q1 1975)
* Q1 1975 – 4.7% (known in late Q2 1975)
* Q2 1975 + 3.0% (known in late Q3 1975)


CLICK CHART TO ENLARGE

What were the negative headlines of the day back in that 1974/1975 era? We tend to forget how bad it was! It was a long list, again, quite similar to today’s slew of bad news.

* Nixon’s Chief Aids Go On Trial
* Ford’s Ban on Wage and Price Controls Draws Criticism
* Nixon Tapes Open Pardon Question
* Arab Oil Nations Warned
* Inflation Spurts 1.3%
* Fed Pledges End to High Interest Rates
* Senate Joins Efforts to Get Nixon Tapes
* Spending Cuts Urged
* Ford Defends Action, Made No Pardon Deal
* Police Stop School March
* Terrorists Hold French Embassy
* Police Escort School Buses
* Nixon Likely to Resign From Bar
* Ford May Pardon Others
* Big Energy Taxes Next?
* West Must Change Ways, Iran Warns
* Terrorists Cut Demands
* President Opposes Gas Tax, Rationing
* U.S.-Soviet Talks Fall Apart
* Tax Hike Heads New Ford Plan
* Energy Crisis to Change Americans
* President Hopes to Cut Inflation by Next Year
* Tapes Reveal Nixon Knew Facts Early
* $3 Billion OK’d For Housing Aid
* Ford Says He Will Prove Polls Wrong
* Mileage Boosted in ‘75 Cars
* Anger at Watergate Trial
* Ted’s Night of Anguish for Mary Joe
* Economic Index Takes Plunge
* U.S. Investigates Food Price Fixing
* Jobless Rate HitsThree-Year High
* Ford Pleads for Inflation Fight
* Financial Crisis Faces Sympathy
* Coal Strike Seems Inevitable
* Stores Ask Voluntary Rationing of Sugar
* Kent State Shooting Guardsman Acquitted
* Skyjacker Dies in Shootout
* 15,625 More Autoworkers Jobless
* Hijackers Hold off Executions
* Recession Hits Auto Plants
* Chrysler May Halt December Production
* Watergate and Hush Money
* Threat of Gas Lines – We’re Using Too Much
* U.S. Economy Flashes New Distress Signals
* Real Wages Nosedive
* HUD Accused of Mortgage Bias
* Watergate Case Goes to Jury
* Gloomy Jobless Rate
* Big Economic Plan Pledged
* A $16 Billion Tax Cut
* Oil Price Batter Balance of Trade
* Ford’s Jobless Forecast Grim
* Highway Funds Low, Projects Cut
* 9.3% Unemployment Hits California
* U.S. Rolls of Unemployment Climbs to 8 Million
* FBI Works On Hearst Case

It must be said, no two market cycles are alike as would be true with the current global credit crisis verses the energy-shock induced malaise of the mid 1970’s.

For investors that held stocks during previous ‘bad news’economic cycles, they were rewarded with significant investment returns. While no one can pick an exact market bottom, we are in the process of finding such levels now. Investors who maintain their diversified basket of securities will be rewarded in time. History suggests it might not in the distant future either.

Source for much of this information from, Market Oracle, in the United Kingdom.

Bold ideas for solving America’s financial mess

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

Below I highlight an article from the Economist Magazine dated September 18, 2008, title Beyond crisis management.

The article centers around a study done by two economists from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) examining financial crisis around the globe from 1970 to 2007.

Guess what? The process that our legislative and executive branches are going through so painfully right now is not the first time a government has had to plod its way through a crisis de jour.

The article reflects two ways governing bodies react to crisises; quick and perhaps hastily (tactical), verses more drawn out and plodding…(strategic)

A few quotes from the report below:

EVERY financial crisis involves a tug of war between the tacticians and the strategists. The tacticians dash from skirmish to skirmish trying to control a crisis, deciding in each case whether taxpayers should bail out a distressed bank, firm or country. The strategists call for a more comprehensive approach to resolving the mess—often involving new government bodies to recapitalise banks or take over troubled assets.

Not a moment too soon, suggest the results of a new study by Luc Laeven and Fabian Valencia, two IMF economists.* They examined all systemically important banking crises between 1970 and 2007, creating a database on how much financial crises cost and how they are resolved. The evidence is clear. Tactical crisis containment is expensive and frequently inadequate. In most financial meltdowns a comprehensive solution was required, and the sooner it was provided the better.

The study looks at 42 crises in all, spanning 37 countries. Like America today, most governments began with ad hoc crisis management. In 74% of cases, for instance, governments pumped emergency loans into failing banks or guaranteed their liabilities. An equally common tactic has been regulatory forbearance. Governments allowed banks to hold less capital than was normally required or softened their rules in other ways. These tactical responses, however, often did not work and ended up increasing the overall bill from a crisis. “All too often”, the economists conclude, “central banks privilege stability over cost in the heat of the containment phase.”

On average, the study finds that government attempts to stanch systemic banking crises over the past three decades have cost 16% of GDP. That average hides enormous variation, much of which depends on how crises were handled. America’s mess, even if it has already led to the demise of famous Wall Street firms, is far from finished. That is why the international lessons are worth taking seriously. Resolving a financial mess is cheaper, quicker and less painful if governments take a rounded approach. For the moment, the bail-out tacticians are in overdrive. But the strategists’ moment is approaching.

As painful as yesterday’s market was, perhaps the delay in creating a ‘bailout’ package is the price we are going to pay to receive a more perfected document.

If fact, much of today’s current crisis centers around ‘mark-to-market’ accounting rules which came from the hastily created Sarbanes-Oxley Act which principally rose from the ashes of Enron and Worldcom.

Thanks for reading. Additionally, feel free to pass my name on to your friends and colleagues. I would be pleased to visit with them!

David Gratke