Archive for the ‘2009 Predictions’ Category

Dow 9800, What is one to do now?

Monday, September 28th, 2009

This posting is a more detailed look at my August 20, 2009 posting

Commentary | Where do the markets go from here?

I’ve recently begun crafting a short list of topics that have me concerned when viewed against the backdrop of current stock market valuations.  This list will be a work in progress.

I could be wrong about market valuations and this may just be climbing ‘the proverbial wall of worry.” However, I think it is important to review these topics and possibly act upon them in some measured manner.

“And the list please”….

The Issues

New Normal.. What is the new normal? It can include any of the following topics,

  • Slower Economic Growth
  • Higher Taxes
  • Higher Government Regulation-i.e. as we now see with CEO pay and bank overdraft fees trying to avoid such regulation
  • Deleverging-Consumer Spending accounts for 70% of US GDP-Paradox of Thrift
  • De-Globalization-The flip side of protectionism
  • Protectionism-i.e. China/Tires Imports/Les Schwab, is it just starting?
  • Higher Inflation-The one ‘easy’ way to retire massive debt-Just don’t tell your grandchildren!
  • US Budget Deficits

Other concerns

  • US Government Policy: not a welcome place for risk-based capital: i.e. GM, UAW vs. Bondholders
  • Cap and Trade-good idea, poor execution so far.
  • Baltic Dry Index-Reflects shipping trade around the world, should be going up if trade is growing
  • China/US Relationships; trade, debt financing, oil to Iran
  • Commercial Real Estate defaults
  • US Dollar Decline
  • National Security-will tough talk work with rogue nation states?
  • Commodities are up-why, where is the economic growth? Is China just restocking its shelves?
  • FDIC hole-i.e. FDIC considers borrowing from banks to shore up its reserves
  • Bank Balance Sheets, how strong are they, now?
  • Sugar High, what happens when the stimulus quits?
  • State Balance Sheets-California.. Who’s next if voters don’t want to be taxed more? Is Oregon in the ‘batters box’?
  • Unemployment-not going away soon-strain on state funding mechanisms.

The Possible Outcomes

  • Excessive Government
  • Higher Interest Rates
  • Higher Taxes
  • Stagflation
  • Unemployment to remain high
  • Cap and Trade, USA at disadvantage to countries without such tax
  • Protectionist ‘trade wars’
  • What else? Let me know what’s on your mind?-Contact Me

Investor Solutions

  • Wealth Preservation Strategies
  • Absolute Return Strategies
  • Inverse Asset Class Strategies

What does your portfolio look like against this current economic, political and social environment?

Ask for a proposal or a review of your plan today.

“Required Reading

As for the market, I think that the markets are overvalued given the prospects for  economic growth. When I read articles about a possible, sizable correction (upwards of 20%) I don’t find too much to fault in those articles.

Stock Rally Could Evaporate Once Stimulus Ends: Algerian
http://www.cnbc.com/id/32688645

Commentary | Where do the markets go from here?
http://www.davidgratke.com/blog/?p=70

Insight: Equities carry too much risk
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e449072-a859-11de-9242-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_c
heck=1

Mohamed El-Erian: July Rally Was A “Sugar High”
http://www.businessinsider.com/mohamed-el-erian-july-rally-was-a-sugar-high-
2009-7

Are Stocks Still Cheap?: A Long-Term Look at Bear Market Valuation
http://mybackpagesbyjessefelder.blogspot.com/2009/09/are-stocks-still-cheap-
long-term-look.html

Economic Vandalism, A protectionist move that is bad politics, bad economics, bad diplomacy and hurts America. Did we miss anything?
http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=14450332

The Oregon Travail, Driving business away with billions in tax hikes.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124545298617532789.html

Commentary | Where do the markets go from here?

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Although world stock markets have made excellent ground in recovering past years’ losses as reported in the Financial Times article dated August 15, 2009,

S&P surge beats post-war record (click to read article)

I continue to remain cautious regarding the longer term outlook for the US and world financial markets. Since nearly 70% of the US economy is consumer based spending, I don’t think the US consumer has gone far enough to repair his/her balance sheet from the past 20 years of accumulated debt loads and diminished savings, hence I do not see a typical recovery from the consumer. There is plenty to be concerned about; I will not elaborate on those matters in this blog. But rather, reflect on the current buzz phrase, ‘new normal’, as I  have discussed this topic in previous blog postings found here. What will the new normal look like going forward?

I have found the following work of interest:

“Courtesy of dshort.com, here is another chart that makes the case to be cautious. The pattern of the 1929 crash adjusted for inflation is surprisingly similar to what we have seen since 2000.”

“Recognize that you can’t use the chart to predict the future. But what you can do is use the chart to realize the possibility of a prolonged bear market.”

Personally, I am still very cautious. We all have yet to fully understand, and appreciate, the debt loads the US Government is taking on and the full impact on both business and consumer alike. Is this mounting debt load a concern? Of course it is, and for that reason Warren Buffet inked an Op-Ed piece on this matter in the August 18, 2009 New York Times found here:

The Greenback Effect (Click to read article)

Selected text from Buffet’s article

To understand this threat, we need to look at where we stand historically. If we leave aside the war-impacted years of 1942 to 1946, the largest annual deficit the United States has incurred since 1920 was 6 percent of gross domestic product. This fiscal year, though, the deficit will rise to about 13 percent of G.D.P., more than twice the non-wartime record. In dollars, that equates to a staggering $1.8 trillion. Fiscally, we are in uncharted territory.

An increase in federal debt can be financed in three ways: borrowing from foreigners, borrowing from our own citizens or, through a roundabout process, printing money. Let’s look at the prospects for each individually — and in combination.

Legislators will correctly perceive that either raising taxes or cutting expenditures will threaten their re-election. To avoid this fate, they can opt for high rates of inflation, which never require a recorded vote and cannot be attributed to a specific action that any elected official takes. In fact, John Maynard Keynes long ago laid out a road map for political survival amid an economic disaster of just this sort: “By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens…. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

What is Buffet saying here? We need to quit our spending spree, but do elected officials have the will to get off the ‘drug of spending?’

By including the chart above, I am not saying that we are going to follow a 1920’s style market decline. First of all, this economic contraction has been much less (so far) than that of the early 20th century. Year-t0-date, this economy has shrunk 3.9% as compared to the 26.7% collapse of the 1920’s. See chart below.

jpmgdp20091

What gives me comfort for my clients within my practice, is that I have asset allocation strategies that have endured much better than the S&P 500 index during the past ten years where the S&P 500 index returned a negative -1.3% annually.

In coming months, I may be recommending client’s shift more of their assets to wealth preservation and absolute return strategies along with continued use of inverse asset classes for such possible ‘range bound’ markets.

As Buffet said in the August 18, 2009 NYT piece,

The United States economy is now out of the emergency room and appears to be on a slow path to recovery. But enormous dosages of monetary medicine continue to be administered and, before long, we will need to deal with their side effects. For now, most of those effects are invisible and could indeed remain latent for a long time. Still, their threat may be as ominous as that posed by the financial crisis itself.

With that quote then, the paddles are standing by, fully charged…..

Thanks for reading.

Sources: Morningstar Advisors, dshort.com, JP Morgan

The Next Bubble, Government Bonds, Part Duex, an Update

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

In my blog posting of January 7, 2009, The Next Bubble, Government Bonds I stated the historic low interest rates on U.S. Government bonds, and what would happen when interest rates began to rise.

Fast forward four months, the bubble for US Government bonds has already burst. Interest rates are rising and US Government bond values are dropping, in some case as much as 20%.

It is a moments like this, that I am reminded that I will need to post a blog article on the difference between ‘certainty’ verses ’safety’. Investors often confuse the certainty of a bond maturity date with safety. Bonds offer anything but safety during rising interest rate.

Note the May 8, 2009 headline from the Financial Times

Treasury yields soar after poor bond auction

Selected text from that article:

US Treasury yields soared yesterday after a 30-year government bond auction saw poor demand, highlighting the balancing act facing central banks seeking to keep interest rates low while selling record amounts of debt.

The investor appetite for relatively safe government bonds has diminished as US stocks have rallied on signs that the pace of the downturn has slowed. However, the rising rates threaten central banks’ efforts to encourage people and companies to borrow and thereby stimulate growth.

The 30-year Treasury yield rose to 4.30 per cent yesterday from 4.10 per cent the day before after bids at the government auction came at lower prices than expected. The 30-year Treasury is now at it highest level since last November. The rise in bond yields has raised questions about whether the Federal Reserve will step up efforts – which began in March – to keep yields down through direct purchases of government bonds.

“It was a terrible auction,” said Tom Porcelli, economist at RBC Capital Markets. “In an environment where markets are pricing in a better macroeconomic backdrop, it is harder to sell bonds at low yields.”

Chart Data: 30 Year US Government Bond Yield

30yryld1

Additionally, note the cover story in Barrons Ran May 18, 2009 issue,

Treasuries Tumble, U.S. Blues

“The bear market in Treasuries will worsen, because of a glut of government bonds.”

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST.

“We’re talking about U.S. Treasury securities, not housing. At the end of 2008, risk-averse investors poured into Treasuries, driving down yields to the lowest levels in decades. The 30-year Treasury bond fetched less than 3%, and short-term T-bills carried yields of zero.”

“Since then, the economy has shown signs of bottoming, the credit markets are functioning more normally, and the stock market has roared back from its March lows. Treasuries now are in a bear market, while bullish enthusiasm has taken hold in other parts of the credit market, including corporate bonds, municipals and mortgage securities, all of which had fallen from favor late last year. The 30-year Treasury, for instance, has risen to a yield of 4.10% from 2.82% at the end of 2008, cutting its price by 20%.”

“Barron’s called a top in Treasuries and a bottom in the rest of the bond market in an early 2009 cover story (“Get Out Now!” Jan. 5). We weren’t alone in recognizing some of the nutty year-end developments. Warren Buffett highlighted the sale in late 2008 by his Berkshire Hathaway of a Treasury bill for a negative yield. Buffett wrote in Berkshire’s annual letter in February that when “the financial history of this decade is written…the Treasury-bond bubble of late 2008″ may rank up there with the housing bubble of the early to middle part of the decade. – How does the market look now? Treasuries still look unappealing for several reasons. Yields are very low by historical standards, the government is issuing huge amounts of debt to fund record budget deficits, and the massive federal stimulus program ultimately may lead to much higher inflation.”

Again, this is a good time to remind investors that bonds do carry risk, especially when interest rates rise from historic lows. Interest rates have only one direction to move over time, up.

Thank you for reading..